Monday, April 6, 2015
Continuing the blog without Trickster
Even if Trickster is willing to move on to new challenges, it would be shame to put The Adventure Gamer completely out of business, especially as we are just on verge of the golden age of pointnclick. Some of us readers got the idea that the blog could continue as a community effort, which sounds great, but well still need to figure out couple of things:
1) Who does all the administrative work, like adding the reviews into blog and putting scores into the spreadsheet?
Ive already volunteered for the job, but if someone wants to become a co-admin, Id love to share the honour.
2) Who will play the games and do reviews?
Ive also said that I can play and write reviews occasionally. Still, I wont be able to do that continuously, so here the efforts of the whole community would be most required. Ive already got few volunteers for a reviewer pool: Aperama, Joe Pranevich, TBD and Deimar at least have expressed interest (sorry, if I overlooked someone). Still, the more committed reviewers we get, the better. Note that Ive already said that I can do the introductory post for any game, if the reviewer doesnt want to spend time for that.
3) Who will get to play what game?
Here are the games remaining for the year 1990:
3) Who will get to play what game?
Here are the games remaining for the year 1990:
Countdown
Spellcasting 101: Sorcerers Get All The Girls
James Bond: The Stealth Affair
Elvira
B.A.T.
Rise of the Dragon
Kings Quest V: Absence Makes the Heart Go Yonder!
I think its best to figure out first what to do with these games, before thinking about the later games. So, anyone particularly interested of any of these?
4) What about scoring?
In the past, we could rely on Trickster having a consistent idea how to score the games. As a guest blogger, I noticed how hard it was to take care that the scores I gave followed the same logic as Tricksters scores. So, do we still want to score games? If so, do we still use the PISSED-system? Do we need to discuss what are the criteria for the scoring or should every reviewer just play by his/hers gut instinct?
5) What to do with CAPs?
Spellcasting 101: Sorcerers Get All The Girls
James Bond: The Stealth Affair
Elvira
B.A.T.
Rise of the Dragon
Kings Quest V: Absence Makes the Heart Go Yonder!
I think its best to figure out first what to do with these games, before thinking about the later games. So, anyone particularly interested of any of these?
4) What about scoring?
In the past, we could rely on Trickster having a consistent idea how to score the games. As a guest blogger, I noticed how hard it was to take care that the scores I gave followed the same logic as Tricksters scores. So, do we still want to score games? If so, do we still use the PISSED-system? Do we need to discuss what are the criteria for the scoring or should every reviewer just play by his/hers gut instinct?
5) What to do with CAPs?
One of the most original features of this blog has been the CAP system, and its been an important part in bonding the TAG community. Do we still want to hold on to the system? If we do, who gets to decide who gets how many CAPs (community vote?, admins?, something else?)?
Also, while Trickster was still blogging TAG, collecting CAPs had a clear purpose, because they could be used for moving Borderline and Disregarded game to Tricksters playing list. Do we still need such a system (at least it was always fun to see what games got enough points) or is it completely useless?
So, this is what I had in mind - let the discussion begin!
Also, while Trickster was still blogging TAG, collecting CAPs had a clear purpose, because they could be used for moving Borderline and Disregarded game to Tricksters playing list. Do we still need such a system (at least it was always fun to see what games got enough points) or is it completely useless?
So, this is what I had in mind - let the discussion begin!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment